Use of assert(false) can trip spurious control flow warnings from
some versions of GCC (i.e. using -fsanitize=thread with gcc-12):
error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
default:
g_assert_not_reached();
break;
| ^^^^^
Solve that by removing the unreachable 'break' statement, unifying
the code base on g_assert_not_reached() instead.
Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20240910221606.1817478-28-pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
[PMD: Add description suggested by Eric Blake]
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Use of assert(false) can trip spurious control flow warnings from
some versions of GCC (i.e. using -fsanitize=thread with gcc-12):
error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
default:
assert(0);
| }
| ^
Solve that by unifying the code base on g_assert_not_reached() instead.
Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20240910221606.1817478-8-pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
[PMD: Add description suggested by Eric Blake]
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Use of assert(false) can trip spurious control flow warnings from
some versions of GCC (i.e. using -fsanitize=thread with gcc-12):
error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
default:
assert(0);
| }
| ^
Solve that by unifying the code base on g_assert_not_reached() instead.
Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20240910221606.1817478-6-pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
[PMD: Add description suggested by Eric Blake]
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Use of assert(false) can trip spurious control flow warnings from
some versions of GCC (i.e. using -fsanitize=thread with gcc-12):
error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
default:
assert(0);
| }
| ^
Solve that by unifying the code base on g_assert_not_reached() instead.
Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20240910221606.1817478-5-pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
[PMD: Add description suggested by Eric Blake]
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Per datasheet, "HIGH AND LOW LIMIT REGISTERS", the lower 4 bit
of the limit registers are unused and always report 0.
The lower 4 bit should not be used for temperature comparisons,
so mask the unused bits before storing the limits.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20240906154911.86803-6-philmd@linaro.org>
[PMD: Update tests/qtest/ files]
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Per datasheet, "ONE-SHOT (OS)", the OS bit always returns 0 when reading
the configuration register.
Clear the ONE_SHOT bit in the WRITE path. Now than the READ path is
simpler, we can also simplify tmp105_alarm_update().
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20240906154911.86803-5-philmd@linaro.org>
The next commit will clear the ONE_SHOT bit in the WRITE
path (to keep the READ path trivial). As a preliminary step,
pass the 'oneshot' value as argument to tmp105_alarm_update().
No logical change intended.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Message-Id: <20240906154911.86803-4-philmd@linaro.org>
To improve readability, use the registerfields API.
Define the register bits with FIELD(), and use the
FIELD_EX8() and FIELD_DP8() macros. Remove the
abbreviations in comments.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Message-Id: <20240906154911.86803-3-philmd@linaro.org>
Coding style asks for no space between variable and "++". The next patch
in this series will change one of those assignments. Instead of changing
just one with that patch, change all of them for consistency.
While at it, also fix other coding style problems reported by checkpatch.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20240906154911.86803-2-philmd@linaro.org>
We shouldn't transmit characters when the full UART or its
transmitter is disabled. However we don't want to break the
possibly incomplete "my first bare metal assembly program"s,
so we choose to simply display a warning when this occurs.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20240719181041.49545-9-philmd@linaro.org>
To keep MemoryRegionOps read/write handlers with similar logic,
factor pl011_read_txdata() out of pl011_read(), similar to what
the previous commit did to pl011_write().
No functional change intended.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20240719181041.49545-8-philmd@linaro.org>
When implementing FIFO, this code will become more complex.
Start by factoring it out to a new pl011_write_txdata() function.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20240719181041.49545-7-philmd@linaro.org>
We'll soon use pl011_loopback_enabled() and pl011_loopback_tx()
from functions defined before their declarations. In order to
avoid forward-declaring them, move them around.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20240719181041.49545-5-philmd@linaro.org>
As per the deprecation notice in commit c7bbef4023:
The CRIS architecture was pulled from Linux in 4.17 and
the compiler is no longer packaged in any distro making
it harder to run the `check-tcg` tests. Unless we can
improve the testing situation there is a chance the code
will bitrot without anyone noticing.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
Message-ID: <20240904143603.52934-5-philmd@linaro.org>
The TC58128 NAND EEPROM is not user creatable and
needs to be instanciated in the code via tc58128_init().
Only the SHIX machine was using it, and it was removed
in the previous commit. Since the TC58128 has no more
users, remove it too.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20240903153959.18392-3-philmd@linaro.org>
