Following on from the DWARF line table: the lookup was only reachable from
hle.backtrace, the breakpoint hit object and the ImGui disassembly status bar.
Now also in
- the ImDebugger call stack (new Source column),
- the Win32 call stack (new Source column),
- the Win32 disassembly status bar, matching the ImGui one,
- the ImDisasmView right-click menu, which showed a bare address as its heading
and now leads with "mesh.zig:163 (08841f98)" when there's a line for it,
- breakpoint log lines - a log-only breakpoint's entire output is those lines,
and "BKP PC=08841f98 mesh.zig:163" reads a great deal better than an address
when you're scanning a few thousand of them,
- crash stack traces, via FormatStackTrace, which is what the crash screen and
crash reporting both use.
That last one is where it earns its keep, and it needed the invalid-jump path to
produce a stack trace at all - it was the one exec exception that didn't. It's
also the one that most deserves it: the address it jumped to tells you nothing,
the callers tell you everything. Execution has already moved to the bad address
by the time it's noticed, so a walk from pc finds no function to start from;
WalkCurrentStack takes an explicit starting pc now, and falling back to ra
recovers the chain. Reproducing the original CrossCraft bug:
CPU Jump: Invalid jump to ae870000 from PC ae870000(invalid) RA 08841f98
MIPS call stack:
rendering.mesh.Mesh(PspVertex).draw at mesh.zig:163 (08841c30+368, ...)
state.MenuState.draw at MenuState.zig:821 (0883ab90+414, ...)
engine.Engine.stepFrameInternal at State.zig:40 (08820f74+5164, ...)
utils.module._module_main_thread at engine.zig:468 (088272c4+2fb8, ...)
Fixed a pre-existing double-report while in there: every case in
Core_ExecException sent its message and then fell through to an unconditional
send of the same message, so each exec exception was logged twice. The message
is built in the switch and sent once at the end now.
pspautotests 314/314, UnitTest 55/55.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GZq8ZtJmFY7bkX5FVkr3P9
The RISC-V branch had its instruction-decode logic (including a locally
defined info struct) written directly inline in HandleFault(), unlike
the other three architectures which each delegate to a dedicated
AnalyzeLoadStore function in their disassembler file. Move it into
ext/riscv-disas.h/.cpp as RiscVAnalyzeLoadStore, matching the existing
X86AnalyzeMOV/Arm64AnalyzeLoadStore/ArmAnalyzeLoadStore pattern.
Added KernelModuleAddressDescription() (Core/HLE/sceKernelModule.cpp),
which looks up which currently loaded module (and text/data/bss/segment
section within it) an address falls in, e.g. "EBOOT.BIN.text+1234".
Wired it into:
- Core_MemoryException/Core_ExecException/Core_BreakException
(Core/Core.cpp), appended next to every address/pc/ra shown in their
log lines.
- FormatStackTrace (Core/MemFault.cpp), appended per-frame next to the
existing symbol description.
This makes crash/exception logs actionable even when there's no symbol
at the faulting address - you at least get which module and section
it's in, useful for reverse engineering unfamiliar code.
Verified live via headless: injected a MIPS break instruction at the
current PC (through Tools/wsdbg) and confirmed the log line changed from
"break instruction hit at 088040ac" to "break instruction hit at 088040ac
[sceDisplayWaitVblank Test.text+ac]".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XDNwPPuidmNxQGRJxBuRL6
* Rename LogType to Log
* Explicitly use the Log:: enum when logging. Allows for autocomplete when editing.
* Mac/ARM64 buildfix
* Do the same with the hle result log macros
* Rename the log names to mixed case while at it.
* iOS buildfix
* Qt buildfix attempt, ARM32 buildfix
* Print simple stack traces to log on crashes.
* Display stack traces on crash screen
* Show the in-function offset in the printed callstacks.
* Libretro buildfix attempt
Might theoretically help in tracking some things down.
Not fully utilized yet, the fault handler needs to extract the
information from the faulting instruction. But we can use it for
GetPointerRange etc.
